Methodology · v2.9

SPTPricing Transparency

Pricing-transparency audit for {legal_name}'s public pricing surface. EXTRACTION RULES: return type="composite_signal" with one entry per dimension, each carrying a 0-100 LLM assessment + a source_url backing that specific dimension. Required sub-dimensions (use these exact names): (a) price_visibility — 0-100 = clarity / completeness of public pricing pages (all tiers visible without sales contact, prices in numbers not "contact us"); (b) subscription_unbundling — 0-100 = are subscriptions / add-ons priced atomically with their own line item (no bundled-fee opacity); (c) hidden_fee_absence — 0-100 = absence of hidden / late / overage / renewal fees buried in fine print (higher = fewer hidden fees); (d) comparison_friendliness — 0-100 = can users easily compare tiers side-by-side (tier table, feature matrix, worked example, total-cost calculator). Cite the official pricing page + at least one independent audit (Capterra pricing-transparency note, G2 pricing comparison, NerdWallet review) per sub-dimension where possible. Server applies composite_signal_score (weighted-average of sub-signals) — DO NOT compute any 0-100 score.